Baker 2016b Nature: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
(Undo revision 214493 by Iglesias-Gonzalez Javier (talk)) Tag: Undo |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Baker M (2016) How quality control could save your science. Nature 529:456–458. | |title=Baker M (2016) How quality control could save your science. Nature 529:456–458. | ||
|info=[https://www.nature.com/news/polopoly_fs/1.19223!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/529456a.pdf Open Access] | |info=[https://www.nature.com/news/polopoly_fs/1.19223!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/529456a.pdf PMID:26819028 Open Access] | ||
|authors=Baker M | |authors=Baker M | ||
|year=2016 | |year=2016 | ||
Revision as of 12:14, 26 January 2021
| Baker M (2016) How quality control could save your science. Nature 529:456–458. |
Abstract: It may not be sexy, but quality assurance is becoming a crucial part of lab life
© 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
• Bioblast editor: Antunes D
Cited by
- Iglesias-Gonzalez et al (2021) Proficiency test in mt-respiration: A necessary tool for reliable and reproducible results. MitoFit Preprints 2021 (in prep).
Labels:
MitoFit 2021 PT
