AMCTB 2016 Anal Methods: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testing—their meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555. | |title=Analytical methods committee, AMCTB No. 74 (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testing—their meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555. | ||
|info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access] | |info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access] | ||
|authors=Analytical methods committee | |authors=Analytical methods committee | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 26 January 2021
| Analytical methods committee, AMCTB No. 74 (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testing—their meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555. |
Analytical methods committee (2016) Anal Methods
Abstract: z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participant’s result and the ‘assigned value’ for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015).
• Bioblast editor: Iglesias-Gonzalez J
Cited by
- Iglesias-Gonzalez et al (2021) Proficiency test in mt-respiration: A necessary tool for reliable and reproducible results. MitoFit Preprints 2021 (in prep).
Labels:
MitoFit 2021 PT
