Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "MitoFit-Medical device"

From Bioblast
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MitoFit page name}}
{{MitoFit page name}}
:::: <big><big>The project MitoFit highlights the benefits of mitochondrial fitness.</big></big>
:::: <big><big>The project MitoFit highlights the benefits of mitochondrial fitness.</big></big>
[[File:MitoFit Work packages.jpg|right|400px|link=MitoFit-O2k#Workpackages|MitoFit Workpackages]]
<br />


<big><big><big>'''WP1'''
:::: '''The O2k from research instrument to medical device'''</big></big></big>


[[Image:MitoFit-O2k.jpg|right|150px|link=http://www.mitofit.org/index.php/MitoFit-O2k|MitoFit-O2k]]
<big>'''The O2k from research instrument to medical device'''</big>
__TOC__
__TOC__


::: '''Abstract'''
 
== Abstract ==


:::: The legal provisions and their impact on the instrument will be collected and evaluated. An action plan will be developed, describing all necessary steps on the way for the O2k to become a medical device. The most effective but also most expensive marketing strategy would be to seek approval as a medical device simultaneously with a CE Mark and FDA clearance for the O2k, since 44% and 24% of our present research instruments are placed in the EU and US, respectively. Regulatory risks need to be considered for the launch of the O2k as a medical device, versus the risk of loosing a market in the EU, US or other countries when audit requirements become more stringent even in the field of mitochondrial research linked to human health and disease.   
:::: The legal provisions and their impact on the instrument will be collected and evaluated. An action plan will be developed, describing all necessary steps on the way for the O2k to become a medical device. The most effective but also most expensive marketing strategy would be to seek approval as a medical device simultaneously with a CE Mark and FDA clearance for the O2k, since 44% and 24% of our present research instruments are placed in the EU and US, respectively. Regulatory risks need to be considered for the launch of the O2k as a medical device, versus the risk of loosing a market in the EU, US or other countries when audit requirements become more stringent even in the field of mitochondrial research linked to human health and disease.   
Line 14: Line 17:




::: '''Links'''
== Links ==


::::* Websites CE and FDA approval: [http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/InVitroDiagnostics/default.htm FDA: In Vitro Diagnostics]
::::* Websites CE and FDA approval: [http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/InVitroDiagnostics/default.htm FDA: In Vitro Diagnostics]

Revision as of 20:47, 28 February 2016


MitoFit Preprints         MitoFit Preprints        
Gnaiger 2019 MitoFit Preprints
       
Gnaiger MitoFit Preprints 2020.4
        MitoFit DOI Data Center         MitoPedia: Preprints         Bioenergetics Communications


MitoFit-Medical device

The project MitoFit highlights the benefits of mitochondrial fitness.
MitoFit Workpackages


WP1

The O2k from research instrument to medical device


Abstract

The legal provisions and their impact on the instrument will be collected and evaluated. An action plan will be developed, describing all necessary steps on the way for the O2k to become a medical device. The most effective but also most expensive marketing strategy would be to seek approval as a medical device simultaneously with a CE Mark and FDA clearance for the O2k, since 44% and 24% of our present research instruments are placed in the EU and US, respectively. Regulatory risks need to be considered for the launch of the O2k as a medical device, versus the risk of loosing a market in the EU, US or other countries when audit requirements become more stringent even in the field of mitochondrial research linked to human health and disease.


Links