Difference between revisions of "MiPNet10.05 O2-Concentration-Flux"
From Bioblast
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | |title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | ||
|info= | |info=[[Media:MiPNet10.05 O2-Concentration-Flux.pdf|'''Open Access-MiPNet10.05.pdf''']]; [http://www.oroboros.at/?Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways], [http://www.oroboros.at/index.php?id=o2-conc-flux www Flux] | ||
|year=2005 | |year=2005 | ||
|journal=Mitochondr Physiol Network | |journal=Mitochondr Physiol Network |
Revision as of 16:24, 28 October 2013
Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - New edition: Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1. |
» Open Access-MiPNet10.05.pdf; Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways, www Flux
Abstract: In a closed oxygraph chamber, the oxygen concentration declines over time as a result of respiratory processes. The time derivative, therefore, is a negative number. Why is then the ‘rate of oxygen consumption’ not expressed as a negative value? Why is the term ‘oxygen flux’ used in this context of chemical reactions? The rationale is based on fundamental concepts of physical chemistry and non-equilibrium thermodynamics. • Keywords: Archive
• O2k-Network Lab: AT_Innsbruck_OROBOROS
Labels:
O2k-SOP