AMCTB 2016 Anal Methods: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingβtheir meanings, and some common misconceptions. | |title=Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingβtheir meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555. | ||
|info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access] | |info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access] | ||
|authors=Analytical methods committee | |authors=Analytical methods committee |
Revision as of 22:25, 25 January 2021
Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingβtheir meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555. |
Β» Open Access
Analytical methods committee (2016) Anal Methods
Abstract: z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participantβs result and the βassigned valueβ for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015).
β’ Bioblast editor: Iglesias-Gonzalez J
Labels:
MitoFit 2021 PT